<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging and Privacy.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hartnall.com/2009/02/blogging-and-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hartnall.com/2009/02/blogging-and-privacy/</link>
	<description>Attempting to convert random thoughts into sentences.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 06:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Hartnall</title>
		<link>http://www.hartnall.com/2009/02/blogging-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Hartnall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hartnall.com/?p=56#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Greg, giving thought to your comment, I think I would revise my choice of words &#039;professional&#039; and &#039;non-emotive&#039; in my post.  These words imply that I won&#039;t talk about controversial or personal issues in my blog.  Actually, I would like my blog to be personal, to express how I truly feel, and to discuss all ideas even if they are provocative.  In hindsight, I think that I really just wanted to say that I will maintain good values and integrity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Concerning having a major theme to my blog, my objective isn&#039;t to build a highly successful blog with a significant or large readership.  Instead I intend it to be my personal blog where I discuss the same sort of ideas that I already discuss with my friends via email, etc...  Therefore, I will just try to separate my thoughts into broad categories.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, giving thought to your comment, I think I would revise my choice of words &#8216;professional&#8217; and &#8216;non-emotive&#8217; in my post.  These words imply that I won&#8217;t talk about controversial or personal issues in my blog.  Actually, I would like my blog to be personal, to express how I truly feel, and to discuss all ideas even if they are provocative.  In hindsight, I think that I really just wanted to say that I will maintain good values and integrity.</p>
<p>Concerning having a major theme to my blog, my objective isn&#8217;t to build a highly successful blog with a significant or large readership.  Instead I intend it to be my personal blog where I discuss the same sort of ideas that I already discuss with my friends via email, etc&#8230;  Therefore, I will just try to separate my thoughts into broad categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Day</title>
		<link>http://www.hartnall.com/2009/02/blogging-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hartnall.com/?p=56#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;ve got to admit I head in a different direction. One of the concerns I have about newspapers is the editing, that in order to keep things &#039;safe&#039;, they dont print provocative articles that make you think.

I think blogging should be an extension of your personality, communicating what you really think. As to topics... most blogs seem to &#039;work&#039; better if there are a few topics or one major theme. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;ve got to admit I head in a different direction. One of the concerns I have about newspapers is the editing, that in order to keep things &#8216;safe&#8217;, they dont print provocative articles that make you think.</p>
<p>I think blogging should be an extension of your personality, communicating what you really think. As to topics&#8230; most blogs seem to &#8216;work&#8217; better if there are a few topics or one major theme. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Hartnall</title>
		<link>http://www.hartnall.com/2009/02/blogging-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Hartnall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hartnall.com/?p=56#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think we can classify these situations into two groups.  The first group is all the communications that you have where there is a limited and specific audience.  For example, something said to some colleagues around the BBQ, or by email, or IM session, or on a telephone call.  The second group are all the communications that are to the public at large.  For example, a letter to the editor of a newspaper, calling a talk-back radio host, or publishing a book.  In the first group of communications, I think you can safely criticise your company and people accept that this is private.  Anything in the second group causes difficulty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we consider blogging, I suspect that it sits in the second group.  A blog is sort of like a mini newspaper where you are the editor!  It is published to the public at large, and therefore even if the readership is very small, I don&#039;t think it is too different to writing a letter to the editor of your local newspaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can classify these situations into two groups.  The first group is all the communications that you have where there is a limited and specific audience.  For example, something said to some colleagues around the BBQ, or by email, or IM session, or on a telephone call.  The second group are all the communications that are to the public at large.  For example, a letter to the editor of a newspaper, calling a talk-back radio host, or publishing a book.  In the first group of communications, I think you can safely criticise your company and people accept that this is private.  Anything in the second group causes difficulty.</p>
<p>If we consider blogging, I suspect that it sits in the second group.  A blog is sort of like a mini newspaper where you are the editor!  It is published to the public at large, and therefore even if the readership is very small, I don&#8217;t think it is too different to writing a letter to the editor of your local newspaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Legg</title>
		<link>http://www.hartnall.com/2009/02/blogging-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Legg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hartnall.com/?p=56#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The situation that causes people the most difficulty is when they are working for a company and then say something about that company on their blog.

Society hasn&#039;t worked out how to classify a post on a blog.  It is like saying something around a BBQ after a few beers?  It is like a professional reporter writing an article and publishing it in a newspaper?  Or something different altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The situation that causes people the most difficulty is when they are working for a company and then say something about that company on their blog.</p>
<p>Society hasn&#8217;t worked out how to classify a post on a blog.  It is like saying something around a BBQ after a few beers?  It is like a professional reporter writing an article and publishing it in a newspaper?  Or something different altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
